A realistic pilot does not always need the assistant to act on live systems. Shadow mode runs the proposed decision path alongside an existing process and records what it would have suggested. It can expose disagreements before action permissions expand, provided the observation path itself is carefully scoped.
Related service: AI automation development- 01Select permitted input cases
- 02Generate isolated proposals
- 03Review disagreements
- 04Approve a bounded next stage
SECTION 01
Define what the pilot can touch
Specify the source data, selected tasks, duration and reviewers. Use synthetic or appropriately permitted historical data where it can answer the question. If live inputs are necessary, limit access and avoid generating notifications or downstream jobs that would make the supposedly passive pilot affect operations.
OWASP's excessive-agency guidance supports narrowing tools and permissions. Ask the agency to prove the shadow credential cannot perform production writes. NIST's risk-management approach also favors evaluation in context; choose a pilot mix that reflects normal and difficult tasks instead of selecting only clean examples.
SECTION 02
Illustrative example: routing incoming service requests
A service team already routes requests to installation, maintenance or general support. A proposed AI classifier observes a permitted sample and records a suggested queue with supporting text. It does not move the live request. Reviewers compare suggestions with the actual route and inspect disagreements.
One disagreement reveals the human used an outdated queue name; another reveals the model ignored a key phrase about an existing contract. The first is not automatically an AI error, and the second should become a regression case. The exercise produces reviewed reasons, not a simple competition between humans and a model.
SECTION 03
Decide the next permission change explicitly
Set acceptance criteria by task and consequence. A first active release may route only clearly defined low-impact cases while keeping ambiguous requests for review. Record exclusions and the operator override path. Do not broaden the workflow merely because the pilot processed many items without a visible incident.
Handoff should include the sampled inputs, reviewer decisions, disagreement categories and the exact configuration tested. Keep a way to return to proposal-only behavior if live results differ. Shadow mode adds review effort and may not reproduce every timing or user-interaction condition; state those limits when deciding how much confidence the pilot provides.
SECTION 04
Frequently asked questions
Is shadow mode the same as a demo?
No. It is an explicitly bounded comparison against representative work, with recorded outputs and review. A polished demonstration may lack those controls.
Can shadow mode send internal notifications?
Only if that side effect is intentionally included. Otherwise disable it so the pilot does not create real work or confusion.
Does a successful pilot justify full autonomy?
Not automatically. Expand permissions by task and consequence, with acceptance evidence, monitoring and an agreed rollback or pause path.
PRIMARY REFERENCES
Sources and further reading
These references cover the standards, platforms, or published prices discussed in the guide. Worked examples and checklists are our editorial guidance.
EDITORIAL METHOD
About this guide
We use AI to assist with drafting and editing. Catapult AI Work is responsible for the published content. Examples illustrate possible approaches; they are not client case studies unless identified as such.
Budget examples are not Catapult package prices. Check linked provider pages for current fees and plan limits before making a purchase.
Read the editorial policy